No doubt, technology has become an integral part of the court reporting processing. The same way you see self-checkout machines at grocery stores and libraries is equivalent to the robotics and voice recognition systems available in modern courts. Courtroom staff can utilize various machines and automated robotics in more ways than ever before. The essence of incorporating technology is to ensure that the reporting process is fast, effective, and accurate.
However, these new developments have made people wonder whether a certified court reporter or stenographer is required. Well, certain situations require a real-time reporter while technology is more effective in other scenarios. Knowing the benefits of each can help you determine what is more effective between technology and real court reporters.
The human element is certainly more effective compared to machines. For starters, a real person can spot errors quickly and point out mistakes during the reporting process, unlike a machine. Then again, there is the risk of a machine breaking down or software malfunctioning midway through a transcription.
Nonetheless, technology has its fair share of benefits in court reporting. Here are a few examples.
Machines are fast and they are able to convert sounds or even shorthand into readable text instantly. However, the gadgets used must be in top condition to deliver quick and accurate reports.
You can also access court reports and transcripts across multiple devices whenever and wherever you want. Whether you are using a tablet or a computer, court reports are available to authorized parties at their own convenience.
Remote video and streaming
Technology offers the option of remote video and streaming, which makes it easier for depositions. Witnesses do not have to come to court in person to give sworn evidence. Instead, the court can use technology to allow witnesses to provide testimonies or depositions remotely.
Tech also allows for easy access to written testimonies and case information instead of applying the slow approach. The information can be synced up to court transcripts for faster reviewing of evidence.
Benefits of a certified court reporter
Using a certified court reporter also has several benefits. Firstly, a live person can clarify information when writing so as not to put any word out of context. A human reporter will also write every word exactly as it was said unlike a machine, which could stop recording certain words when spoken softly. And since courts depend on the accuracy of information, any slight mistake or machine breakdown could dent the chances of someone winning their lawsuit.
So, what next?
Both technology and human stenographers have their upsides and downsides. Machines allow easier and quicker access to case information and they can help courts cut down on costs that might go into hiring a stenographer. Human reporters might be slow but the fact that they are able to clarify information makes them the ideal choice in most situations. You just need to check and compare the advantages of the two options to decide which one fits your preferences.